On 28 January 2014 21:27, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 January 2014 21:21, Quildreen Motta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > But later, once `flatMap` is introduced, you'll be able to deal with > nested > > promises without breaking parametricity: > > > > Promise.flatMap :: (Promise(a)) => (a → Promise(b)) > > > > If that's correct, I don't see any use cases for Promise.resolve right > now, > > unless a library where to provide a corresponding unspecified `flatMap` > > implementation. > > The V8 implementation provides it under the name `chain', with the > obvious semantics. Considering that the fantasy-land specification uses the `chain` name as well, this is really neat.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
