There are still unresolved issues in the Rev22 spec. with the newModule (or
possibly new Module) API. t probably needs to say that any property names must
conform to IdentifierName.
The grammar requirement of IdentifierName is intentional and I don't believe
there is any intent to allow that restriction to be circumvented via the Module
API.
Allen
On Jan 29, 2014, at 8:54 AM, John Lenz wrote:
> I assume that I can access this like so:
>
> var mod = newModule({'a.b.c':1})
> use(mod['a.b.c']);
>
> It isn't clear to me why imports and export names are restricted.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> // a.js
>
> var foo = 1;
> export foo as 'a.b.c';
>
> // b.js
>
> import 'a.b.c' as foo from "a.js"
>
>
> That is not valid. Export binding names (where you have 'a.b.c') must be
> IdentifierName.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
