On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 2:27 PM, John Lenz <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't argue that it isn't a useless "let". I do point out that in > "sloppy" mode, that other declaration are allow in practices by browsers. > Chrome allows function, const, and var in the body of an if without block. > > Did you mean to include const? Only IE11 has implemented const and let with the proper semantics (with the exception of the for loop let binding mistake, which will be corrected). Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
