Andy Wingo wrote:
On Wed 12 Feb 2014 15:22, Thaddee Tyl<[email protected]> writes:
> The following ES6 code's behaviour puzzled a few developers I know.
> The results indicated below each snippet are run through
> SpiderMonkey's implementation.
SpiderMonkey's implementation of for-let is out of date, AFAIK. I
couldn't find a bug about it though.
Could you please file one?
ES6 specifies what Thaddee wants: a binding per iteration, and a "0th
iteration binding" in case there's a closure capture in the first part
of the head.
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
