On Feb 18, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2511 > > We now have our first setter in the spec. However, it is speced to return the > value itself. This is pretty inconsistent with WebIDL and the common practice > to not include a return value in setters in object literals. > > Can we get the spec changed to return undefined?
undefined seems fine, as the result of the set function is never returned to userland when it is invoked as a setter. Allen > > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
