I think we can settle this now. Lets allow an argument.
On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:27:26 AM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Andy Wingo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't see the point of throwing an error when calling .next('foo') on > > a newborn generator. We don't throw an error on .next('foo', 'bar'), > > and unlike the case with most function calls there is no way to get the > > 'bar' when resuming a generator, as you don't have an arguments object. > > > > I would punt on this issue entirely, and ideally remove the > > "suspendedStart" state from the spec, renaming "suspendedYield" to > > simply "suspended". > > > > Just MHO:) > > I agree, and I thought we agreed at the last TC39 meeting, but I was > wrong or else it got lost. > > We'll settle it at the early April meeting. > > /be > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
