Thanks for the pointer!
I like Claude's use-case and recall Allen citing it too. So, two reasons:
1. Higher-order functional programming wants a function, not literal syntax.
2. Subclassing Array works too, thanks to ES6's class-side inheritance.
/be
Rick Waldron <mailto:[email protected]>
March 3, 2014 at 6:09 AM
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Claude Pache <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Le 3 mars 2014 à 04:22, Mark Volkmann <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
> What is an example of a use case where one would choose to use
Array.of instead of the literal array syntax?
>
Back when Dave Herman and I first dreamed up Array.of, I wrote this
up: https://gist.github.com/rwaldron/1074126#arrayof--variable-arity-
Rick
Here is one case where literal array syntax is not possible:
class ImprovedArray extends Array { ... }
let a = ImprovedArray.of( ... )
—Claude
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Claude Pache <mailto:[email protected]>
March 2, 2014 at 11:47 PM
Here is one case where literal array syntax is not possible:
class ImprovedArray extends Array { ... }
let a = ImprovedArray.of( ... )
—Claude
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
Mark Volkmann <mailto:[email protected]>
March 2, 2014 at 7:22 PM
What is an example of a use case where one would choose to use
Array.of instead of the literal array syntax?
--
R. Mark Volkmann
Object Computing, Inc.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
