David I know the analogy was weak but since indeed you said there's nothing like that, I named the one that felt somehow close because of some implicit behavior.
I am personally easy going on modules, I like node.js require and I think that behind an await like approach could work asynchronously too but I don't want to start a conversation already done many times so ... I'll watch from the outside, waiting for a definitive "how it's going to be" spec before even analyzing how that even works. IMO, modules in ES6 went a bit too far than expected. Take care On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:45 AM, David Herman <dher...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Mar 14, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I like that more I read about this, more the `with` statement comes into > my mind ... > > There's nothing like this in JS today, so if you're only looking for > precedent there, you're only going to be able to come up with weak > analogies. The differences between aliasing bindings from a module with a > fixed, declarative set of bindings, and aliasing bindings from an arbitrary > user-specified and dynamically modifiable object are massive. > > And see my reply to JJB to get an understanding of why this is such an > important semantics. tl;dr non-busted cycles. > > Dave > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
