I really appreciate you guys making === (not just ==) work for value types. I think that drastically improves the usability compared to earlier proposals.
I can see Andreas's concerns regarding what that means for their object-ness though. But hopefully that can be worked out while still keeping a useful ===. From: Niko Matsakis<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: ?Wednesday?, ?April? ?2?, ?2014 ?07?:?32 To: es-discuss<mailto:[email protected]> I just wanted to let people on es-discuss know about two of my recent blog posts concerning typed objects. The first is a kind of status report: http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/04/01/typed-objects-status-report/ and the second details some (preliminary) thoughts on how one could build on typed objects to support user-defined value types: http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/04/01/value-types-in-javascript/ Niko _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
