On 19 April 2014 20:14, Allen Wirfs-Brock <al...@wirfs-brock.com> wrote:
> I'm in the middle of updating the spec. of [[OwnPropertyKeys]] to returns an 
> Array rather than an Iterator. While doing this I realized that because 
> [[OwnPropertyKeys]] is essentially a new MOP level operation we have the 
> opportunity to precisely define the property key ordering it exposes for 
> ordinary objects. This seems like a one-time opportunity that we shouldn't 
> pass up.
>
> Note that this doesn't necessarily mean we need to change the 
> unspecified/weakly specified ordering of exiting library functions such as 
> Object.keys (even though they are specified in terms of [[OwnPropertyKeys]]). 
>  But it does mean that new library functions such as Reflect.ownKeys will be 
> defined with a fully specified specified ordering.
>
> The ordering I propose is:
> 1) All array index property keys, in ascending array index numeric order. 
> Followed by:
> 2) All other string property keys, in property creation order. Followed by:
> 3) All symbol property keys, in property creation order

Creation order? I don't know about other VM's, but for V8 it's
unlikely that we are willing to pay the price for tracking that
accurately.

/Andreas
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to