I don't understand the issue. Could you give a tiny example test case for checking the specced order vs one for checking the order as you think it should be specced?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Qantas 94 Heavy <[email protected]>wrote: > We need a deterministic order. What deterministic order do you suggest? >> Why would it be better? >> > > Sorry for the confusion, I completely worded that wrong. > > I'm specifically referring to the specification sections 23.2.3.1 > and 23.2.3.4 (specifying the behaviour for Set#add and Set#delete), which > states that: > > 6. Repeat for each e that is an element of entries, *in original >> insertion order* > > > I don't see any real reason why that's needed, unless there's some odd > side effects of doing so that I'm not aware of. Sets are meant to be unique > and I don't think the order of checking whether the element already exists > really matters. I'm not advocating for any change for the deterministic > order of iteration in Set#forEach and for-of loops on sets. > -- Cheers, --MarkM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
