On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:17 PM, Domenic Denicola <dome...@domenicdenicola.com> wrote:
> Anyway, regardless of the specifics of my `using` proposal, I hope that > highlighting the iterability vs. disposability aspects of this conversation > was helpful to people. I do think it's helpful for understanding the space, thanks. But here's why I don't think it ultimately helps: we are going to need combinators for iterators, and they are going to have to make the same decision. We aren't going to have e.g. map and mapDispose. I still contend that the common case is that iterators are short-lived, and the language should safely ensure they are disposed of. So the combinators should ensure that their underlying iterator is disposed of, and for-of should behave consistently with the combinators. Dave _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
