On 5 May 2014, at 20:22, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote:

> @mathias didn't mean to change atob and btoa rather add two extra methods 
> such encode/decode for strings (could land without problems in the 
> String.prototype, IMO) with "less silly names" whatever definition of silly 
> we have ^_^

Agreed. Moving `TextEncoder`/`TextDecoder` to ES would be nice (but it requires 
`ArrayBuffer` / `Uint8Array`). http://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#api
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to