just for record sake, I've re-explained what's the issue here in a node.js
related thread:
https://github.com/joyent/node/issues/7587#issuecomment-42796524

Best Regards


On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
[email protected]> wrote:

> also, on top of this ... I'd like to add the fact that es5-sham, the drop
> in everyone thinks is cool to use to support old browsers not compatible
> with ES5, is entirely based on own properties since ever:
> https://github.com/es-shims/es5-shim/blob/master/es5-sham.js#L310
>
> the owns definition in that scope:
> https://github.com/es-shims/es5-shim/blob/master/es5-sham.js#L28
>
> I've never filed a bug against it, because as it is it has been just safer
> for "the old" Web
>
> Best Regards
>
> P.S. we are 1 year later on fixing this :-(
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> just wrote this down ... it takes an eye blink to agree with and adopt
>> even in ES6, IMHO
>> https://gist.github.com/WebReflection/48aecb771e61e8a3e168
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 11:08 AM, John-David Dalton <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Rock, will do. Thanks!
>>>
>>> - JDD
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to