Andreas Rossberg wrote:
On 4 June 2014 00:12, John Lenz<[email protected]> wrote:
> No I intentionally used "let". This is not legacy code (I shouldn't have
> use the word "existing") but new "sloppy" mode code that would like the code
> to be block scoped.
Why would you want to write new sloppy mode code, though? Honest question.
Realistically, you should consider the larger question, why will new
sloppy-mode code be written? The answer is obvious: it's the default mode.
But there's still a fair amount of hostility to "use strict", based on
folklore about deoptimization (one reason), but also based on other
arguments. One that came up on twitter recently:
https://twitter.com/rem/status/471766603034791936
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
