I’m assuming that people will default-export objects (for Underscore.js-like
libraries). I’d call those pseudo-modules, because one would be partially
working around the module system (no load-time errors!).
Maybe we’ll import modules like this [^1], but that feels syntactically
inconsistent to me and you don’t get load-time errors, either:
```js
import "Underscore";
const _ = System.get("Underscore");
```
[^1]: https://gist.github.com/domenic/2230a7195fa0de31a227
On Jun 9, 2014, at 16:28 , John Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:54 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On the other hand, we’ll have many pseudo-modules, which is also a barrier
> against making progress later on.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what a pseudo-module is. Are you saying that the
> core import/export system is not correct and that we should have a system
> based exclusively on 'module'?
>
> jjb
--
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
[email protected]
rauschma.de
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
