`import "./foo" as foo;` certainly looks nice.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > IIUC, the motivation for dropping the form is that it's confusing to have > this other syntactic option which uses a different (contextual) keyword. > > Well, we already have this: > > import "./foo"; > > which you can use when you want to load+execute but not import anything. > Is that going away? If not, then it makes sense to just add a renaming > clause: > > import "./foo" as foo; > > Does that help with the confusion? > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
