Hi Maxime,
Good to see you here :-)
This topic has been discussed recently on Twitter. See
https://twitter.com/jeremyckahn/status/474259042005553154
I'm like Rick's answer in particular
https://twitter.com/rwaldron/status/475017360085364736
as I believe a large share of cloning is just about data
As discussed in this Twitter thread, immutable data structures would be
an interesting idea too. If an object is guaranteed to be deeply
immutable, then, it can be passed around without the need for cloning.
Clones are only necessary because the initial object is mutable in the
first place.
Immutable data structures have been briefly discussed here recently:
https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2014-June/037429.html
(see replies too)
David
Le 11/06/2014 08:49, Maxime Warnier a écrit :
Thanks for your answers.
Object.assign seems good but provides only copy for enumerable
properties, not a real deep clone.
I know for jquery, that's why i precised "only for DOM" but it was
just to show the syntax :)
2014-06-11 0:00 GMT+02:00 Rick Waldron <waldron.r...@gmail.com>:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Maxime Warnier <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All
Do you know if it is planned or maybe in discussion for ES7 to have a
simple clone system on objects ?
There are different notations, from :
- jquery
Object.clone( [withDataAndEvents ] [, deepWithDataAndEvents ] )
jQuery doesn't clone objects, it clones DOM elements.
Rick
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
