For anyone interested in the transpiler story around the existing spec I opened an issue here: https://github.com/google/traceur-compiler/issues/1072
- Matthew Robb On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 5:43 PM, Kevin Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Caridy, > > Please forgive my occasional hyperbole, I think es-discuss is best served > with a dash of spice now and then. : ) > > I agree that the current design is somewhat confusing. That's because it > represents a perfectly balanced compromise between the multi-export, > remote-binding design favored by PL-types, and the single-export design > favored by developers accustomed to Node.js and AMD. That duality is > inherent in the design, and it is critical for its acceptance among all > parties. > > Removing "ModuleImport", in effect, tips that balance away from > multi-exports and jeopardizes the compromise, and jeopardizes the effort. > > The inherent duality and resulting "confusion" should be left to evolution > to work out. Supporting both outcomes (or a mixture thereof) is a feature, > not a bug. That's my take, anyway. > > On the other hand, the lack of "__dirname", etc. was a major hole and > thank you for addressing it! > > Kevin > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
