On Thu Jun 12 2014 at 11:28:12 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[email protected]> wrote:
> It would be slightly more "JavaScripty" to have > Date.prototype.[[DateValue]] exist, and be set to the epoch or some > such. > +1 1. Let date be the this value. 2. If Type(date) is not Object then, throw a TypeError exception. 3. If date does not have a [[DateValue]] internal slot, then let tv be NaN 4. Else let tv be this time value. 5. Return ToDateString(tv). Allen, what is the benefit to do `super.toString()` instead? > > This problem actually seems to be an artifact of the way that > [[Construct]] works in ES6 -- but the takeaway is that prototypes of a > class are not themselves instances of the class. It's not surprising > that methods of the class thus don't work on the prototype. I'd vote > WONTFIX. > --scott > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
