On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Erik Arvidsson <[email protected]> wrote: > What would `C.prototype.constructor` look like with your proposal?
ES6 already achieves `C.prototype.constructor === C`, for both functions and classes, simply by defining the two properties that way (in [1] steps 6 and 7). I wouldn't change that. > Is `C === C[@@new]`? Good question. I think calling `C(...args)` should be the same as calling `new C(...args)`. How best to specify that, I'm not sure. I don't think `C === C[@@new]` needs to be a goal, since it wouldn't hold for regular functions, or for classes that don't define a constructor (those inherit their @@new method from the base class), or for classes that contain a `static [Symbol.new]()` method. But as an implementation detail, if that's the easiest way to specify it, OK. -j [1]: http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-makeconstructor _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
