On 6/18/14, 3:40 AM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
Personally I think two traps are more intuitive and convenient (and are present in many other languages: C++, Ruby, etc)
C++ has the sorts of restrictions on calling the superclass constructor (have to do it up front, can't skip doing it) that the @@new proposal has, no?
and that "parent constructor should always be called" is a subjective, and just one of the semantics.
While true, I'd like to see a concrete proposal about how we actually proceed with making the web platform subclassable in the @@create world. Whereas in the @@new world subclassibility by default is at least somewhat viable...
-Boris _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
