Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
This is also one of my bigger concerns. I think the rewriting and
reinterpretation of what the use wrote as a a constructor may be very
problematic. For example,how does this get translated:
class extends C {
constructor() {
super();
super.foo(); //apply the inherited foo method to the new object
}
}
If we had a design that didn't require the rewriting of the user
provided constructor I'd be much more comfortable. Thinking...more
latter...
I used to think this way, but dherman pointed out years ago that
constructor in ES6 class is a special form, even though it looks like a
method. Here's an es-discuss thread from three years ago:
http://esdiscuss.org/topic/why-not-new-instead-of-constructor
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
