On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is a key sentence in David’s proposal: “ES6 favors the single/default
> export style, and gives the sweetest syntax to importing the default.
> Importing named exports can and even should be slightly less concise.”
>

There are a lot of large modules that will not disappear overnight. I
assume ES6's recommendation for such things (Node's fs module, Lo-Dash) is
to make those container objects default exports?

-- 
Michał Gołębiowski
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to