Domenic Denicola wrote:
This is part of a larger issue regarding the messaging of TC39 and versioned ECMAScript, which is somewhat out of touch with [reality](https://twitter.com/annevk/status/479334108150374401).
(Spinach.)
I hope we can discuss this at the next TC39 meeting. But I don't mean to derail the thread.
Too late.
> ```js > import * as fs from "fs"; // importing the named exports as an object > ```This looks great. Other alternatives I thought about in response included `import { * } as fs from "fs"` and `import module fs from "fs"`, but upon consideration the brevity of yours wins. I just hope we can do better documenting it, this time around, and fixing the many transpilers with their confusing semantics.
Finalize the normative spec, see what happens. /be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
