Yes Tab, I've seen first Anne's reply and felt the urge to jump into this worried somebody would have changed that.
OK, let's keep it here then ... <trollface>and use an offline DOM node to simulate the DOM behavior </trollface> Jokes a part, I've read here and there that Rick W. is going to propose something close to EventListener so maybe this is a good opportunity to specify such behavior in there too? Best Regards On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Andrea Giammarchi > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am saying that if your requestAnimationFrame throws mine should keep > > working without problems as if your click handler fails mine should still > > work properly even if added after yours. > > Yes, that's the desired behavior and how everything in DOM works > today, but which is difficult to reproduce in pure ES. Boris is > suggesting we should have a way to reproduce this behavior easily in > ES. > > > If the problem is being able to reproduce this in JS then there should > be no > > ticket fired in HTML land and W3C since their behavior is actually > expected > > and IMO correct since ever. > > Note that this thread is in es-discuss, not a DOM mailling list, and > Boris explicitly asked in the OP about whether this sort of thing > should be addressed in ES. > > ~TJ >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
