>
>
>>
> I don't agree that the changes to the semantics are large, if we're
> talking about simply allowing a single syntactic form for both named and
> default import and Ron's option (A) (where default and named exports can
> not co-exist... until ES7 at least).
>
But unless you want to rewrite the design, you cannot prevent a default
export and named exports from co-existing:
function F() { }
export { F as default }; // Named and default
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
