> If it had good enough support for circular dependencies, would we be able > to make sense of "module-as-module" designs? >
Side note: I meant "object-as-module" really. It's kinda funny that I capped off all of that with such a silly mistype. : )
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
