On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:09 AM, John Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > The arguments for and against supporting cyclic dependencies seem to be > academic. I'm yet to see any evidence of their importance in practice nor > proof they they are fundamental ... or not. > Data point: I once implemented a system like for Firefox. I got asked for cyclic dependency support 3 weeks after shipping. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384168#c7 That system that Alex Fritze invented and I worked on is not perfect, and the syntax isn't very pretty. But it's still getting used 7 years later, so it must have gotten something right. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/JavaScript_code_modules/Using - Rob
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
