On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> wrote:
> I find the specification of template strings still a bit difficult to > understand: > > β The abbreviations TV and CV are used 12.2.9, but defined in 11.8.6.1. > Did you mean TV and TRV? This is no different than: - String SV and CV - Number MV Which are all defined in Chapter 11 > β Tagged templates are explained > via EvaluateCall(tagRef, TemplateLiteral, tailCall). I think it would be > easier to understand if it used GetTemplateCallSite. > > β Itβd be nice if untagged template strings and tagged templates could be > mentioned closer together. They are basically the same thing and this > structure seems to be dictated by grammar. To me, template strings are more > like tagged templates without a tag. Would it make sense to specify them > that way? > (no response, I'll let Allen address these) Rick
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
