I am not sure I understand your problem but AFAIK php introduced "use" to
simulate JavaScript implicit outer scope access instead of the explicit
global context php is (in)famous for, it comes quite as a surprise you are
asking JS to simulate PHP here :-)
`var test,
fn;
fn = new Function('value', 'return function (){console.log(value);}');
fn('hello');`
I don't see why would you pass through Function instead of just wrapping
that function.
```js
var fn = (function(floatNum, genericString){
return function (anotherArg) {
console.log(floatNum, genericString, anotherArg);
};
}(
// here the equivalent of your "use"
Math.random(),
'whatever'
));
fn('yo'.sup());
```
will produce something like:
0.3651656119618565, whatever, <sup>yo</sup>
Best Regards
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Michaël Rouges <michael.rou...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is any plan around un functionnality like the "use" keyword, in PHP.
>
> Why something like that? Because, in JS, there is no way to inject some
> variables,
> without touch the this object known in a function.
>
> The lone possible way is with ownmade functions, in the same context, by :
>
> `var test,
> fn;
>
> fn = new Function('value', 'return function (){console.log(value);}');
>
> fn('hello');`
>
> Really boring to share some private variables...
>
>
>
> Michaël Rouges - https://github.com/Lcfvs - @Lcfvs
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
