Brett Andrews wrote:
I think the most obvious and least confusing/breaking way for `super` to function is for it to be the equivalent of `let super = super.[method_name]`
(No `.[` there, that may be used in the future to mean something else -- or not!)
This argues for the flip-side: disallow super.currentMethod or super.otherMethod or anything like that. If `super` by itself means "the method in the superclass with the same name as the enclosing method, bound to `this`", then you can't get at peer methods. Maybe that's ok (Rubyists think so).
/be _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
