>
>
> The plan is to leave the iteration protocol "duck-typed" or "structural",
> but enable reuse of common array-extra-like methods via Iterator.prototype
> (which will be on the generator iterator objects' prototype chains).
>
> The Iterator function can be used as an adaptor, to go from any old
> iterator (duck-typed) to an instance of the nominal type.
>

That sounds good (although I haven't thought it through), but is that plan
incompatible with comprehensions as a syntactic convenience?
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to