I disagree, Although I don't comment here, I do follow the discussion and I have been working with --harmony on Node.js for a while now. The path seems to be going in the right direction. The things that reach implementation status tend to help, I have found lot's of features very constructive.
Languages tend to evolve, that's how it is. Francisco On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 10:54 AM, L2L 2L <[email protected]> wrote: > It worry me... That a community is writing the spec... That a community is > writing the spec.... Look like W3C... That everyone is striving to get what > they want in the language. > > Most of us are ES5 developers.... Meaning we don't delve into ES6 and what > else to come. > > let, const, and a couple of others spec implantation is okay. These help > better the language... But your adding feature and no trying to better > what's already there. > > You might as well call yourself W3C equivalent.E > > As long as one can write compliant ES5. > > A new more stricture spec/style is being made. It's call ES5+ meaning that > all compliant code is to be writing in ES5 and additional add on as the let > and const statement plus other +. > > What I see is more functionality of the browser api then an actually > language. A lot of us hope this spec die, as did ES4. > > Most of what you're adding could have been another add on spec... Like > commonjs add on. > > Have fun destroying a language. > > ES5+4Life > > E-S4L > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
