On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Mark S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there are no objections to recommending .js vs .jsm in this informal > way, I propose that we place it there. FWIW, .jsm extension is currently used as a convention in XUL for denoting "JavaScript modules" (not the same thing as ES6 modules): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/JavaScript_code_modules/Using For other associations of the .jsm extension, see http://filext.com/file-extension/JSM
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
