Kevin Smith wrote:
Well, what I'm trying to point out is that it's always an error to set
"this" if "new^" is undefined. So it's kind of strange to force the
user to explicitly write that conditional:
constructor(x, y) {
if (new^)
this = new super(x);
this.y = y;
}
With the header approach, it's taken care of:
constructor(x, y) : super(x) {
this.y = y;
}
(using colon just to avoid bikeshedding)
Isn't the latter (since it specifies ": super(x)") actually identical to
constructor(x, y) {
this = new super();
this.y = y;
}
IOW, isn't it "I am constructor only and will throw if {[Call]]ed)?
Herby
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
