I normally do it, today out of excitement did a mistake, sorry for that! On Sep 23, 2014 7:52 PM, "Brendan Eich" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hemanth H.M wrote: > >> > It is one proposed syntax for async functions. >> >> Cool, thanks. >> > > Not sure who wrote the >-cited line -- Jeremy didn't. > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Jeremy Martin <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> This has come up a few times. Check out this thread, for example: >> http://esdiscuss.org/topic/generator-arrow-functions. >> >> > Jeremy makes a good point, which would help reduce noise on the list if > everyone grokked it. Check esdiscuss.org (use site:esdiscuss.org search > with keywords) before posting. Several threads lately would have been > avoided by the original poster doing this and finding the answer. > > It's sometimes hard to find with a quick search -- you may need to look > around and refine your search. We surely could use a consolidated rationale > document for the many design decisions in ES6. But we have a resource in > esdiscuss.org, which can help cut down on noise. > > /be > > >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Hemanth H.M <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Is there a mention about it somewhere? >> >> Something like: >> >> ``` >> gen = (x) * => yield x+2; >> >> ``` >> >> I understand that arrow functions are lexically bound and has >> an explicitly return in it's a one liner. >> -- /'I am what I am because of who we all are'/ >> h3manth.com <http://www.h3manth.com> >> /-- Hemanth HM/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >> >> >> >> -- Jeremy Martin >> 661.312.3853 <tel:661.312.3853> >> http://devsmash.com >> @jmar777 >> >>
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
