But that said an new name and structure would be fine with me. I'm a little worried "stack" would be out of sync with "stack trace" or whatever. Making stack an accesor of "stackTrace" would help but what do we do with writes? On Sep 28, 2014 4:35 PM, "John Lenz" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Firefox has changed aspects (adding columns and other things) so I think > it is possible that we can change this. Was there hard data otherwise? > On Sep 28, 2014 6:26 AM, "Erik Arvidsson" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Last time this was tried the conclusion was that the current format using >> the stack property as a string could not be standardized. Different >> browsers use different format and therefore the format can not be changed >> without breaking existing code. >> >> The conclusion was that we needed to use a different name and then we >> might add well stop using a string to represent this structured data. >> >> Other than that. Great. +1. >> On Sep 28, 2014 2:10 AM, "Boris Zbarsky" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 9/28/14, 1:15 AM, John Lenz wrote: >>> >>>> * the "stack" property (a string) >>>> >>> >>> I'd somewhat like to see this be an accessor, to allow implementations >>> to compute the stack string lazily. >>> >>> Does this sound like a reasonable minimal set? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. >>> >>> -Boris >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> >>
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
