On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rick Waldron <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jeremy Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not sure if this is sufficient motivation to accelerate the timeline >> > > > It's not about "motivation", it's about realistic time constraints. TC39 > has already had to push out 6 months and that was not taken well by both > the community and by Ecma. Further delay is not an option. > > Just out of curiosity: what's the realistic "out of time" issue here? Actually, I think having a ready and working algorithm draft on github gist will help discussing this faster and in realistic time frames (I've should've done before starting this thread; otherwise, these are "too abstract time-stoppers" for me -- unless you know specific big issues that will be hard to implement). > > >> for adding suitable parallels from Array.prototype, but it may be worth >> recalling what developers did last time there were obvious "gaps" in what a >> native prototype provided. Array#contains, anyone? >> > > As a community we'll simply have to reject the use of code that directly > modifies built-ins. This is also not a very strong argument in the ES6 > world where built-ins can be subclassed. > > Actually the case with "borken" `Array#contains` which is so actively discussed, is a good example. I think very likely `Map#map`, and `Map#filter` will be added manually if not in ES6. Dmitry
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
