Boris Zbarsky wrote:
If this is how Records work, it would be good to spell that out
explicitly.
Mutable records have reference, not value, semantics -- good point.
Some might object to calling any such spec-internal device a "record".
This use of spec-internal reference-semantics mutable "record" could be
awkward in a future edition:
https://github.com/sebmarkbage/ecmascript-immutable-data-structures
Does the spec anywhere else need reference semantics for its internal
list and record types?
/be
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
