On Oct 29, 2014, at 6:59 AM, Andreas Rossberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 28 October 2014 17:38, Allen Wirfs-Brock <[email protected]> wrote: >> Also I'll check if it's feasible to make it a runtime error for a global let >> to shadow a non configurable property of the global object. > > Is there a reason why we cannot make it an error for any present > property? Maybe that would even allow us to get rid of the VarNames > list? Perhaps, there is a legacy that requires that var/function declarations can over-write global object properties. There is no particular reason that we have to allow this for let-like declarations. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
