Forgot to link the bug... :( Here it is: https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3421
Also, I filed this: https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3422 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Isiah Meadows <[email protected]> wrote: > @Allen I did find a few cases of obvious dead spec code, notably > %Loader%, %LoaderPrototype%, and %LoaderIteratorPrototype%. I'll file > bugs as I find more. ([link to this bug]( > > @Domenic I didn't realize that the module loading was intended to be > spec'd out elsewhere. > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Dec 8, 2014, at 8:23 AM, Isiah Meadows wrote: >> >>> >>> Also, this removal seems to have left quite a bit of spec equivalent >>> to dead code, >> >> Can you identify specific instances in the latest draft? In theory, I've >> already eliminated all such dead code. If you can identify stuff I've >> missed I'll get rid of it. >> >> Allen > > > > -- > Isiah Meadows -- Isiah Meadows _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
