On Dec 10, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Dave Herman wrote: > I owe everyone a draft of the loader semantics, but for now here's a way to > think about the interface between Ecma-262 and the loader spec: the "names" > the ES spec is talking about are *not* the names used by the loader or in the > registry. They are just GUIDs -- you can think of them as just being > references to the internal module record, but serialized as GUID strings. > AIUI Allen wanted to reify them as strings just to provide a more abstract > way for the loader spec to reference module records without actually looking > at their internals.
Dave, you may not have noticed that in the latest released draft they are called moduleIDs rather than moduleNames. Allen _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
