> > >> I'll just throw out mixins as a possible reason to keep enumerability. >
I don't think enumerability really bears on mixins in ES6, because (for one) the mixin source could have symbol-named properties. A fully-featured mixin function will need to use Object.getOwnPropertySymbols, etc.
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
