On Wed Dec 31 2014 at 2:45:57 PM Alex Kocharin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Firefox does parse `let=1` as illegal, > Under what circumstance? All of these function according to the spec: let = 1; console.log(let); // 1 var let = 1; console.log(let); // 1 let let = 1; // SyntaxError (http://jsfiddle.net/rwaldron/L5kbtup6/) Rick > > > 29.12.2014, 17:39, "Erik Arvidsson" <[email protected]>: > > This is a bug in Traceur. > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014, 11:35 Gary Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > From the specification I saw `yield` is being explicitly declared as an > possible Identifier in non-strict mode, and there `let`, `static` are > parsed as identifier first. However, I did not see anyway to distinguish > `let` identifier and `let` keyword. `let=1` is parsed as illegal in > traceur, and so does `static=1`. Is this a bug of traceur or it is > intended? It would be incompatible in non-strict mode if this is intended. > (And if this is intended, there will be no reason for keep `let` and > `static` non-reserved-word during lex stage) > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > , > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
