Forgot to retitle it. On Jan 3, 2015 9:44 PM, "Isiah Meadows" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > From: Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: es-discuss list <[email protected]> > > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2015 03:17:54 +0100 > > Subject: Re: Implicit coercion of Symbols > > Does it have to be a Reflect.* method? It could be > `Symbol.prototype.getDescription()` or a getter. > > > >> On 04 Jan 2015, at 02:25, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Rick Waldron wrote: > >>> > >>> That example above is pretty compelling for throw always consistency. > >> > >> > >> With a new Reflect.* API for converting a symbol to its > diagnostic/debugging string? > >> > >> If you agree, please file a bugs.ecmascript.org ticket. > >> > >> /be > >> _______________________________________________ > >> es-discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > > > -- > > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > > [email protected] > > rauschma.de > > A good name for such a getter would be, IMO, > `Symbol.prototype.description`. It would also seem to fit with some other > common JS idioms, such as `Array.prototype.length`, etc. It also feels > clearer and cleaner as a getter than an instance method or function. >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
