Reason for the verbose and quirky output in 6to5 is due to performance, see
https://github.com/6to5/6to5/pull/203
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Fabrício Matté <[email protected]>
wrote:
>>
>> Point 2 is incorrect (e.g. `new (Foo.bind.apply(Foo,
>> [undefined].concat(args)))`).
>>
> I stand corrected. That's very good news, thanks!
> Nice and elegant solution, by the way.
> I should have taken the time to look at how current transpilers handle
> that. Your solution is similar to Traceur's generated output, but it is
> also interesting to see how [6to5 spreads arguments in a NewExpression](
> http://6to5.org/repl/#?experimental=true&playground=true&evaluate=true&loose=false&code=class%20Foo%20%7B%7D%0Avar%20arr%20%3D%20%5B%5D%3B%0Anew%20Foo(...arr)%3B
> ).
> Oh, I also had a typo in the previous mail (`s/rest parameters/spread`),
> guess I was a bit too sleepy last night.
> /fm
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
