At the moment that throws too. Anyways it's something to hammer on a bit.
Maybe Jordan can kick it around too.

Thanks,
-JDD

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <al...@wirfs-brock.com>
wrote:

>
> On Jan 28, 2015, at 5:03 PM, John-David Dalton <
> john.david.dal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Primary issue is in  isTypedArray(a):
> Uin32Array.prototype.buffer.call(a);
>
>
> Besides the typos, accessing .buffer throws in at least Chrome & Firefox.
> Then .buffer is an object so if it doesn't throw there's no .call to
> execute.
>
>
>  the ES6 definition of %TypedArray%.prototype.buffer:
>
> %TypedArray%.prototype.buffer is an *accessor property* whose set
> accessor function is undefined. Its get accessor function performs the
> following steps:
>
> 1.     Let O be the this value.
> 2.     If Type(O) is not Object, throw a TypeError exception.
> 3.     If O does not have a [[ViewedArrayBuffer]] internal slot throw
> a TypeError exception.
> 4.     Let buffer be the value of O’s [[ViewedArrayBuffer]] internal slot.
> 5.     Return buffer.
>
> ES6 expects buffer to be implemented as an accessor property.  That means
> that the probe in my test should be:
>
> Object.getOwnProperty(Uint32Array.prototype.__proto__, ‘buffer’).get.call(a);
>
> Allen
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -JDD
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <al...@wirfs-brock.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 4:40 PM, John-David Dalton <
>> john.david.dal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Kind of a bummer. The isTypedArray example from
>> https://esdiscuss.org/topic/tostringtag-spoofing-for-null-and-undefined#content-59
>>  is
>> incorrect. Is there an updated reference somewhere?
>> The toStringTag result is handy because it allows checking against
>> several tags at once without having to invoke multiple functions each with
>> their own try-catch and all that perf baggage.
>>
>> How is it incorrect?  Are you referring to the fact that both typed
>> arrays and DataView objects have a [[ViewedArrayBuffer]] internal slot.
>> If so, I think this is a specification but that I should fix.
>>
>> Allen
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Reply via email to