On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/29/15 4:21 PM, Brendan Eich wrote: > >> I was hoping someone deeper into WebIDL (and with more time for it than >> I have right now :-P) would do that. >> >> I missed the part of the first-day TC39 meeting where this was resolved, >> so I hope someone who was there can speak to the WebIDL plan, if any. >> > > Yes, to make this clear, I was talking about people who were at the > meeting. I presume that the Web IDL interactions were considered, since > they came up in the earlier discussion. Are you asking what to do about the fact that existing WebIDL "classes" produce enumerable properties that probably can't be made non-enumerable without breaking the web? > > > -Boris > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
