On Feb 13, 2015, at 11:37 AM, Michael Ficarra wrote: > Even given what Allen said? I'm indifferent toward it at this point. Allen is > right that it's not particularly useful to allow it, but disallowing it is > also inconsistent with all related productions.
You can submit it, but I'll just mark it as deferred for ES7 consideration. Syntax Errors like this are future proof in the sense, that they can always be related in the future without breaking anything. Allen > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Brendan Eich <[email protected]> wrote: > Please file a bug, ASAP. Thanks, > > /be > > Michael Ficarra wrote: > Is there any reason why a trailing comma is not allowed in an > ArrayBindingPattern when it has a BindingRestElement? I noticed yesterday > that my parser was erroneously allowing these, but the inconsistency with > both ArrayLiterals and ObjectBindingPatterns is bothering me. Is this simply > a mistake in the grammar? I understand that we wouldn't want to allow holes > or other BindingElements to follow the BindingRestElement, but I don't see a > problem with a single trailing comma. > > Michael Ficarra > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > > > -- > Shape Security is hiring outstanding individuals. Check us out at > https://shapesecurity.com/jobs/ > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
